AstroWay vs Prokerala

Here's a full natal chart on AstroWay — copy-paste with a free key:

# cURL
curl -X POST https://api.astroway.info/v1/chart \
  -H "X-Api-Key: aw_live_your_key" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"date":"1990-07-14","time":"14:30","timezoneOffset":3,
       "latitude":50.45,"longitude":30.52}'

// Node.js (fetch)
const r = await fetch("https://api.astroway.info/v1/chart", {
  method: "POST",
  headers: { "X-Api-Key": process.env.ASTROWAY_API_KEY, "Content-Type": "application/json" },
  body: JSON.stringify({ date: "1990-07-14", time: "14:30", timezoneOffset: 3,
                         latitude: 50.45, longitude: 30.52 }),
});
const { data } = await r.json();
console.log(data.planets[0]); // { name: "Sun", longitude: ... }

علم الفلك الغربي + تصميم الإنسان في واجهة برمجة تطبيقات واحدة. OpenAPI 3.1 → توليد SDK تلقائي. MCP لمحاكي الذكاء الاصطناعي.

• نقاط نهاية غربية 176 مقابل 60
• تصميم الإنسان 12 مقابل 0
• OpenAPI 3.1 مقابل لا شيء
• خادم MCP مقابل لا شيء
• وضع حماية كامل

Prokerala’s credit costs swing widely — a basic panchang is cheap, a Saturn-transit PDF runs into hundreds of thousands of credits — which makes mixed workloads hard to budget. AstroWay’s per-endpoint credit costs are flatter and predictable, with 10,000 free credits/month and paid plans from $5.

If you use Prokerala only for Vedic, AstroWay’s vedic endpoints cover the same techniques (dashas, vargas, panchang) plus Lal Kitab, KP and Jaimini. Point your client at api.astroway.info, generate a key, and the OpenAPI 3.1 spec and SDKs handle the request/response mapping.