AstroWay/api v2.95.1 · hi
सभी सिस्टम सामान्य हैं

How Accurate Is the Swiss Ephemeris? Verified Benchmarks

Swiss Ephemeris accuracy in numbers — planetary positions under 0.1 arcsecond, exact house cusps, eclipses within a minute — and how AstroWay verifies it.

Short answer: the Swiss Ephemeris computes planetary positions to better than 0.1 arcsecond against Astrodienst’s reference. AstroWay runs that same engine and verifies the output against three independent sources plus the NASA eclipse catalog. The numbers below are what we actually measure, not marketing claims.

The Swiss Ephemeris is the C library from Astrodienst (the people behind astro.com), derived from NASA JPL’s DE431 ephemeris. It’s the same engine inside professional desktop software — Solar Fire, Kepler, Janus, Astro Gold — that astrologers have trusted for 30+ years. AstroWay compiles it to WebAssembly and serves it over REST, so you get that precision without installing a C extension or shipping ephemeris data files.

WhatDriftReference
Planetary positions< 0.1″ (arcsecond)Astrodienst swetest CGI
Placidus house cusps0.000″ (exact match)swetest
Eclipses< 1 minuteNASA 5-Millennium Eclipse Catalog
Astrocartography (ACG) lines< 1.5 km at the equatorswetest
Sunrise / sunset< 10 secondstimeanddate.com
Moon void-of-course, ingresses, conjunctionssub-secondswetest

Two layers:

  1. Triangulation. Core calculations are cross-checked against three independent implementations — Astrodienst’s official swetest CGI, Kerykeion, and Prokerala — plus the NASA 5-Millennium Canon of Solar Eclipses. When sources disagree, the divergence is documented rather than hidden.
  2. Regression snapshots. 818 snapshot tests pin the output of the calculation endpoints. Every pull request re-runs them against the live swetest CGI and the NASA catalog, so a drift can’t slip into production unnoticed.

The full methodology and per-endpoint divergences live on the accuracy page.

The Swiss Ephemeris has three precision modes. The full JPL-derived mode is the default. The built-in Moshier mode trades a little precision (still well under an arcsecond for most use) for not needing data files — fine for a horoscope app, overkill to worry about for a research tool that needs the JPL path. AstroWay uses the high-precision path by default, so you don’t have to choose.

Is the Swiss Ephemeris accurate enough for professional astrology? Yes — it’s the same engine in Solar Fire and Kepler, accurate to under 0.1 arcsecond for planetary positions.

How does AstroWay differ from running pyswisseph myself? Same engine, no install. You skip compiling a C extension and shipping ephemeris files; you make an HTTPS call instead. See REST vs library.

Can I see the verification data? Yes — the accuracy page lists the references and per-endpoint divergences, and the regression suite runs on every change.

AstroWay team

AstroWay API की इंजीनियरिंग टीम। हम Swiss Ephemeris को साफ REST में लपेटते हैं और उन 'न boring' विवरणों के बारे में लिखते हैं जो असल में मायने रखते हैं।

// इस पर बनाएं

वही Swiss Ephemeris जो Solar Fire में है — बस 4 लाइनों के कोड में।

कार्ड के बिना मुफ्त कुंजी। पहले भुगतान तक 5,000 कॉल प्रति माह।

ब्लॉग से और सभी पोस्ट →

Engineering 2026-06-05

Natal Chart API in TypeScript: SDK + React Example

Compute a natal chart in TypeScript with the AstroWay SDK — typed responses, a React component, and where it beats a local ephemeris library.

Ephemeris 2026-06-05

Swiss Ephemeris: REST API vs pyswisseph (When to Use Which)

pyswisseph vs a REST API for Swiss Ephemeris calculations — C dependencies, data files, licensing and deployment compared, with a decision guide.

Engineering 2026-05-21

वैदिक ज्योतिष एपीआई: पराशर से लाल किताब तक 354 एंडपॉइंट्स में

एस्ट्रोवे अब वैदिक ज्योतिष के लिए सबसे व्यापक कवरेज प्रदान करता है: 10 दशा प्रणाली, 16 वर्ग, पंचांग, पूर्ण लाल किताब + केपी + जैमिनी। यह कैसे काम करता है और कब कौन सी तकनीक चुननी है।