AstroWay/api v2.204.0 · ko
모든 시스템 정상 작동 중

Swiss Ephemeris: REST API vs pyswisseph (When to Use Which)

pyswisseph vs a REST API for Swiss Ephemeris calculations - C dependencies, data files, licensing and deployment compared, with a decision guide.

Almost every “how do I do astrology in code” answer points at pyswisseph - the Python bindings for the Swiss Ephemeris C library. It’s excellent. But it’s a C extension you compile, data files you ship, and chart logic you write yourself. A REST API removes all three. Here’s an honest comparison so you pick the right one.

pyswisseph exposes the raw Swiss Ephemeris functions: swe_calc_ut, swe_houses, and friends. You get maximum control and offline operation. In return you take on:

  • A C extension. It compiles on install: fine on your laptop, a recurring source of CI and Docker friction (build tools, wheels per platform/arch).
  • Ephemeris data files. For full JPL precision you ship the .se1 files (tens of MB). The built-in Moshier mode avoids them at a small precision cost.
  • The astrology layer. swe_calc_ut returns a longitude. House systems, aspect detection, dignities, chart assembly - you build all of it.
  • Licensing. The Swiss Ephemeris is dual-licensed (AGPL or a paid professional license). If you ship it inside a closed-source product, that’s a question you have to answer.

AstroWay runs the same Swiss Ephemeris on its own servers, behind HTTP:

from astroway import Astroway, BirthData
aw = Astroway(api_key="aw_live_...")
chart = aw.chart.compute(BirthData(
date="1990-07-14", time="14:30:00", timezone_offset=3,
latitude=50.45, longitude=30.52,
))

No compile step, no data files, no house-system code - and the licensing of the engine is the provider’s problem, not yours. You add a network round-trip and an API key, and get 761 endpoints (houses, aspects, synastry, transits, Vedic, Human Design) instead of just planet longitudes.

pyswissephREST API
InstallCompiles a C extensionpip install, pure Python client
Data filesShip .se1 for full precisionNone - server-side
Chart logicYou write itEndpoints return it
OfflineYesNo (needs network)
Licensing of engineYour responsibilityProvider’s
Beyond longitudesBuild yourself761 endpoints
AccuracySwiss EphemerisSame engine, verified
  • Use pyswisseph for an offline CLI, a notebook, a desktop app, or when you need the library to run with no network and you’re comfortable owning the data files, the chart code and the license question.
  • Use a REST API for a web app, a serverless function, or any service where you don’t want a C build in your pipeline or ephemeris files in your image - and where you’d rather call synastry or transits than implement them.

Both are the same math. The choice is about what you want to own.

MakSeong · AstroWay

AstroWay API를 만들고 있어: Swiss Ephemeris를 순수 REST로 감싸고, 실제로 중요한 지루한 세부사항을 기록합니다.

// 이걸로 빌드해

Solar Fire에 사용된 것과 동일한 Swiss Ephemeris - 단 4줄의 코드로.

카드 없이 무료 키. 첫 결제 전까지 월 5,000 API 호출.

더 많은 블로그 글 모든 글 보기 →

Ephemeris 2026-07-19

우리가 정확성을 제어하는 방법: CI vs swetest 및 NASA

아스트로-API의 정확성은 하나의 에프메르에디드 리팩토링으로 쉽게 저하됩니다. CI의 보호를 분석합니다: 앱과 API를 위한 하나의 스위스 에프메르에디스 핵심, 수백의 스냅샷이 동결된 표준 맵에, swetest CGI, Kerykeion, Prokerala 및 NASA의 어두움 카탈로그에 대한 각 PR의 삼각화.

Engineering 2026-07-15

세 개의 공식 SDK: TypeScript, Python, PHP, 원시 curl 대신

원시 HTTP는 작동하지만, 타이핑된 클라이언트는 시간을 절약합니다: 경로 자동 완성, 요청 및 응답 유형, 408/409/429/5xx에 대한 내장된 재시도 및 스테인리스 스타일 오류 계층 구조. 세 개의 공식 SDK - @astroway/sdk (npm), astroway (PyPI), astroway/sdk (Packagist) - 및 하나의 OpenAPI 계약에서 생성된 방법을 살펴봅니다.

Industry 2026-06-05

Free Astrology API: Which One Has the Best Free Tier in 2026?

A side-by-side of free tiers across the major astrology APIs - credits, request caps, card requirements - and how much you can actually build for free.